Search found 20 matches
- Fri Feb 21, 2020 3:53 pm
- Forum: Hardware
- Topic: DM9051 SPI Ethernet example?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10457
Re: DM9051 SPI Ethernet example?
I second this request. Any engineers at espressif know where dm9051 dev boards can be purchased? I did find this schematic: https://www.dacomwest.de/images/Dateien ... o_v2.1.pdf
- Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:42 pm
- Forum: Hardware
- Topic: How to flash a WROOM module using an FTDI programmer?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 23944
Re: How to flash a WROOM module using an FTDI programmer?
Clicking the link directly didn't work. Right-clicking and "open in new private/incognito" window worked for me.
- Fri Apr 26, 2019 11:59 am
- Forum: Documentation
- Topic: Documentation Requests/Feedback
- Replies: 81
- Views: 211585
Re: Documentation Requests/Feedback
Unrelated documentation request: Can you document how aps are sorted when esp_wifi_scan_start() is called? I work in an environment with a TON of wifi access points, and I'd like to only grab the top 10 ssids found sorted by rssi. However, it isn't documented how APs are sorted when esp_wifi_scan_ge...
- Thu Apr 25, 2019 2:23 pm
- Forum: Documentation
- Topic: Documentation Requests/Feedback
- Replies: 81
- Views: 211585
Re: Documentation Requests/Feedback
Thanks. I saw that link earlier, but it says "Note: Currently this document refers to ESP8266 only. ESP32 has some additional headers." Any idea when the esp32 specific headers might be added there?"
- Wed Apr 24, 2019 1:53 pm
- Forum: Documentation
- Topic: Documentation Requests/Feedback
- Replies: 81
- Views: 211585
Re: Documentation Requests/Feedback
There really needs to be documentation of the esp32 file header. Where is the checksum stored? Where is the signature stored for image verification? What is the checksum algorithm? We put out own image header into the esp32, and since we need to insert our image size into the image, we have to re-ca...
- Sat Mar 23, 2019 2:54 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: NimBLE port for ESP32
- Replies: 8
- Views: 16105
Re: NimBLE port for ESP32
Any idea if/when this will make it into mainline? The code size reductions would be fantastic. Update: Sorry, didn’t notice that the dates on this topic we’re so recent. It makes me look extremely impatient! I’ve been playing around with some builds of NimBLE and have been impressed. You all did a f...
- Tue Feb 19, 2019 10:19 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: [Answered] How to build a subset of the possible components in ESP-IDF?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 39127
Re: [Answered] How to build a subset of the possible components in ESP-IDF?
Any chance -flto will ever be implemented? Yes, there's a strong chance (but no ETA that I know of). It's not like you all don't have enough on your place, but in our internal projects, we've found up to a 40% reduction in binary size when link-time optimizations are added. Impressive. Is that in E...
- Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:46 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: [Answered] How to build a subset of the possible components in ESP-IDF?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 39127
Re: [Answered] How to build a subset of the possible components in ESP-IDF?
Any chance -flto will ever be implemented? It's not like you all don't have enough on your place, but in our internal projects, we've found up to a 40% reduction in binary size when link-time optimizations are added.
- Wed Sep 05, 2018 11:11 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Preview release: CMake-based build system for ESP-IDF
- Replies: 65
- Views: 80696
Re: Preview release: CMake-based build system for ESP-IDF
That’s great! Thank you. My company is in the middle of a very rushed evaluation of the esp32 platform, along with a couple others. One requirement is that it integrate easily into our cmake build system, and another is that we can demonstrate simultaneously running WiFi and Bluetooth. A bug that’s ...
- Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:39 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Preview release: CMake-based build system for ESP-IDF
- Replies: 65
- Views: 80696
Re: Preview release: CMake-based build system for ESP-IDF
I have a favor to ask. There are a few bugs that have been fixed in master on the bluetooth end that have not been reflected on the feature/cmake branch. I know it's only experimental, but would you all be able to merge master into feature/cmake?