I've been looking through datasheets and instruction references for the Xtensa processor that is in the ESP32 but because of Xtensa's extensible nature, I can't seem to find reliable information, so here is my question… Does the ESP32-WROVER B have any SIMD-like instruction capabilities that allow y...

Did you make sure to set the base path for LittleFS correctly when initializing it and calling esp_vfs_littlefs_register() to mount the partition? static esp_vfs_littlefs_conf_t conf = { .base_path = "/data", .partition_label = "data", .format_if_mount_failed = true, .dont_mount = false, }; After mo...

I've been using LittleFS on the ESP32 for 2 years now and I'm really happy with it. Now, though, I tried to make an `ftruncate()` call to trim a file to size, only to find it's not implemented in the esp-littlefs virtual file system. LittleFS supports the function and the VFS even has a pointer memb...

Yes, I ran some tests the other day and noticed that, which was very good news. Thank you.

Thanks for the link. I saw that before but was not sure if all the code is actually loaded into memory or not.My assumption was that it is, but I'll have to look into it some more, I suppose.

I would like to embed certain system files in my `firmware.bin` file to make sure the firmware and the files are always in sync. However, I do not want these files to be a part of the program code itself, meaning, I do not want them to be loaded into RAM, using up valuable memory. Instead, I would l...

Awesome, thank you so much!

Is it possible to print the stack trace at runtime, the way it is printed after a crash? For debugging purposes, I would like to know who called a certain function when a particular condition is encountered.

Thanks for any suggestions!

While looking through the FreeRTOS runtime stats, I noticed that on my device, the btController task looks like a real performance hog. The device is 70% idle and 20% are used up by my main task. Some minor tasks are each well under 1% accounting for no more than 3 % altogether. However, the btContr...

Thank you so much!