Search found 643 matches
- Wed Jul 24, 2019 2:27 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: (solved) working with efuses
- Replies: 13
- Views: 16247
Re: working with efuses
Hi WiFive - no, this isn't from the first run. In the first run, I programmed values into BLK3. But on subsequent runs, I'm getting this: E (109) system_api: Base MAC address from BLK3 of EFUSE version error, version = 0 when I call esp_efuse_mac_get_custom(). According to the docs, that suggests th...
- Tue Jul 23, 2019 9:44 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: (solved) working with efuses
- Replies: 13
- Views: 16247
Re: working with efuses
BTT...anyone have any suggestions on this?
Thanks...
Thanks...
- Mon Jul 22, 2019 2:49 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: (solved) working with efuses
- Replies: 13
- Views: 16247
(solved) working with efuses
Hi all - I recently started working with the efuse handler. I need to store a custom MAC address in BLK3, so I wrote the following routine: esp_err_t Flash::initBaseMacAddress() { char macAddrAscii[18] = { NULL_CHAR }; esp_err_t rc = ESP_OK; ESP_FUSE3 fuse3; // see whether efuse has been programmed ...
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:50 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ideas for on-chip log storage?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1720
ideas for on-chip log storage?
Hi all - I've been asked to look into adding syslog functionality to our product. Part of the requirement is storing the logs on the ESP32 for some period of time (probably 24 hours). Does anyone have an idea on how best to do this? Storage space is probably going to be an issue, so using the NVS li...
- Wed May 22, 2019 2:03 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: (resolved) questions about manufacturing utility
- Replies: 18
- Views: 18868
Re: questions about manufacturing utility
Hi Shivani - Thanks for the patch; it looks like it's working properly now. Which release will this patch appear in? I'd like to propose an enhancement to this tool. We're planning on using it to create nvs files that contain factory defaults for the units we manufacture. It would be very helpful if...
- Tue May 21, 2019 2:27 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: (resolved) questions about manufacturing utility
- Replies: 18
- Views: 18868
Re: questions about manufacturing utility
Hi Shivani - If I understand you, the 2nd entry in my values file was missing a bunch of commas. So, I added them. Here are my two files now (this time I'm posting the complete files to avoid confusion): config.csv: CD_FACTORY,namespace, SERIAL_NBR,data,string MAC_ADDR,data,string NVS_LABEL,data,str...
- Mon May 20, 2019 1:49 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: (resolved) questions about manufacturing utility
- Replies: 18
- Views: 18868
Re: questions about manufacturing utility
Hi shivanit - The term "PST8PDT,M3.2.0/2,M11.1.0" is indeed supposed to be one item; that's the reason for the double quotes. I want the last line to be considered a new line. If I understand the docs, by using the REPEAT tag in my config file, I should only need two fields in my values file. But th...
- Fri May 17, 2019 10:01 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: (resolved) questions about manufacturing utility
- Replies: 18
- Views: 18868
Re: questions about manufacturing utility
Hi Roland - Thanks for the reply. I'm not sure whether it's not working, or if I'm doing something wrong. I'm trying to use the "REPEAT" tag, like so: config.csv: CD_FACTORY,namespace, SERIAL_NBR,data,string MAC_ADDR,data,string NVS_LABEL,data,string,REPEAT DEVICE_NAME,data,string,REPEAT VERSION,dat...
- Thu May 16, 2019 3:55 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: (resolved) questions about manufacturing utility
- Replies: 18
- Views: 18868
Re: questions about manufacturing utility
Hi -
Any updates on this?
Any updates on this?
- Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:47 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: (resolved) I2C call panicking system
- Replies: 29
- Views: 27294
Re: I2C call panicking system
It's been running 28 hours now without a problem. I'm not claiming that I don't have a heap problem somewhere, but the lesson I'm taking from this is to not permit the possible overlapping of calls into the I2C library.
Thanks to all who looked at this with me.
Thanks to all who looked at this with me.