Search found 95 matches
- Wed Feb 22, 2017 2:15 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ESP32-Lyra Smart Audio
- Replies: 15
- Views: 27580
Re: ESP32-Lyra Smart Audio
We are going to release this, although I'm unsure how much is going to be open-source and how much is going to be closed libraries. Unfortunately, I do not have an exacy timeline for the release; as an educated guess I would think it should happen in two to three months from now, however. More open...
- Wed Feb 22, 2017 1:48 pm
- Forum: Sample Code
- Topic: Bluetooth Classic - How to implement it!
- Replies: 11
- Views: 17082
Re: Bluetooth Classic - How to implement it!
According to Espressif, they don't have Classic support in the idf at this time (I know, annoying...sigh...). It's not of too much concern for me yet, though. Since they've implemented CEVA's IP cores for Bluetooth, the odds of it not working for this generation of silicon is fairly low. It's just t...
- Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:10 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Bluetooth classic
- Replies: 14
- Views: 26257
Re: Bluetooth classic
Mostly because it's not ported to main esp-idf yet. We do have some HCI work fleshed out, as well as audio profile already working. I asked around, work to get all that into esp-idf will be starting this week. (It's most likely going to be post-esp-idf-v2.0 before it will make it in, though.) Is th...
- Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:08 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Bluetooth classic
- Replies: 14
- Views: 26257
Re: Bluetooth classic
Hi, I have seen that Bluetooth Classic is not yet supported by the ESP32 SDK, only BLE. Are there any plans to add BT classic support in the near future? It this an SDK limitation or a hardware limitation? Thanks for your help Matt It's definitely not hardware. They're using a Riviera Waves/CEVA IP...
- Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:22 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Bluetooth classic
- Replies: 14
- Views: 26257
Re: Bluetooth classic
Kind of...odd...to not have the support. Is this because of considerations on the HCI side of the equation not being fully fleshed out or is it because you've just not got a good API wrapper for the same?